There is significant perplexity among researchers as to who the primary Egyptian Pharaoh might have been, who governed over all of Egypt from his capital at Memphis. As per the lords list made a thousand years after his time, his name was Men, Meni or Mena. The explanation behind utilizing diverse vowels is on the grounds that as a part of Egyptian composition vowels are not composed (as now and again in Arabic) and these must be speculated. The Greek history specialist Mantheo of 200 BC who was known for creating careful verifiable records, called him Menes in Greek. That is the most well known way Mene is specified in current writing. This pharaoh is the unbelievable lord that originated from the town of Tinis in Upper Egypt and assumed control Bring down Egypt (the North) by drive. He then turned into the main lord over the entire nation and established another capital for joined Egypt – Memphis, exactly where the two states verged on each other. As indicated by archeological dating this was around 3200 BC. For a great many years, Ruler Menes was thought to be the main lord of Egypt. Antiquated Egyptian records obviously recognize him as the main lord of the principal line.
Video Link :http://wp.me/p8bcM6-s
However from that point forward much else has been found by archeological discoveries that has prompted to some perplexity. In the most recent decade of the 1900s the old imperial tombs in Abydos were re-uncovered. Two seal impressions were found from the tombs of Lair and Qaa, the fifth and eighth leader of the principal tradition. The theme was a line of rulers in a progressive request, and both had Narmer as the organizer of the primary line. This record ought to be a bona fide one since it originates from a period much before Menthos or even the Rulers list. The majority of all, it was set up by the descendents of Narmer himself. A few researchers proposed that Menes and Narmer might be a similar individual. Is it true that it was truly so? The matter requires promote enquiry. The seal impressions of Lair and Qaa portray the rulers of the principal tradition as:
Along these lines plainly Aha was the child and successor of Narmer. Ruler Aha, then again, was the main pharaoh who fabricated landmarks of substance over the entire nation, and his extensive tomb developments (with covered retainers interestingly) were in measurements that far dominated his ancestors including Narmer his dad. He has likewise left a composed sign translated as the name “Mene” composed adjacent to his customary name on one event. This without a moment’s delay shows that he is the same as lord Mene (or its Greek shape Menes). In this manner accessible proof shows that it was Aha and Menes who were one and a similar individual and not Narmer and Menes.